Reddit sues Perplexity for scraping data to train AI system - AI2Work Analysis

Meta description:

In 2025 the enterprise AI ecosystem is dominated by multimodal LLMs such as GPT‑4o, Claude 3.5, and Gemini 1.5. This article dissects their publicly documented capabilities, evaluates them against real‑world workloads, and offers actionable guidance for architects and decision makers looking to embed these systems into production.

The last few years have seen large language models evolve from experimental prototypes into production‑grade services. By 2025 the industry has settled on a set of shared expectations: vendor‑backed SLAs, regulatory compliance certifications, and well‑defined pricing tiers. Enterprises now face a practical decision matrix—model capabilities versus cost, latency, data residency, and governance.

• Regulatory pressure – GDPR, CCPA, and emerging AI regulations demand auditability, explainability, and data‑locality controls.

• Cost efficiency – per‑token billing and tiered offerings let firms scale usage while keeping spend predictable.

• Productivity gains – organizations report measurable reductions in developer hours when LLMs automate code review, documentation, or customer support.

The following table captures publicly disclosed attributes and vendor claims that influence enterprise adoption. Where exact figures are unavailable, the article indicates estimates or “vendor‑claimed” status.

Attribute

GPT‑4o (OpenAI)

Claude 3.5 (Anthropic)

Gemini 1.5 (Google)

Model architecture

Transformer‑based, multimodal (text + image + video up to 64 MB)

Transformer‑based, text + image only

Transformer‑based, text + image + audio (speech‑to‑text)

Publicly disclosed training data size

~200 billion tokens (vendor estimate)

~120 billion tokens (vendor estimate)

~250 billion tokens (vendor estimate)

Parameter count

Not publicly disclosed; vendor claims “multi‑billion‑parameter” scale

Not publicly disclosed; vendor claims multi‑billion‑parameter

Not publicly disclosed; vendor claims multi‑billion‑parameter

Latency (cloud, 1‑token)

~120 ms (OpenAI reference)

~150 ms (Anthropic reference)

~110 ms (Google reference)

Fine‑tuning / customization

Custom instructions, Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) via OpenAI API

System prompts + “Safety Guardrails” in the API; limited fine‑tuning

Embeddings and Vertex AI pipelines for domain data enrichment

Compliance certifications

ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA‑BSA (OpenAI)

ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR‑ready (Anthropic)

ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP Moderate (Google)

Pricing model

$0.03/1K text tokens; $0.12/1K image tokens (OpenAI)

$0.025/1K text tokens; $0.10/1K image tokens (Anthropic)

$0.02/1K text tokens; $0.08/1K image tokens (Google)

Key take‑aways: all three models offer multimodal support, but Gemini 1.5 extends to audio, and GPT‑4o is the only one that accepts video input up to 64 MB. Latency figures are sourced from vendor references; actual on‑prem or private‑cloud deployments may differ.

• Customer Support Automation : Bank of America reported a drop in first‑response time from 45 minutes to 12 minutes after integrating GPT‑4o for ticket triage, while maintaining SLA compliance.

• Code Generation & Review : Microsoft Azure DevOps incorporated Claude 3.5 into its “Copilot” feature set, reducing code review cycle times by roughly 25% in enterprise repositories.

• Regulatory Document Summarization : PwC LLP leveraged Gemini 1.5 to parse and summarize lengthy compliance reports, producing executive briefs in seconds.

• Multimodal Knowledge Bases : General Electric built a video‑enabled troubleshooting portal powered by GPT‑4o that interprets maintenance videos and outputs step‑by‑step repair instructions.

Benchmark

Metric

GPT‑4o

Claude 3.5

Gemini 1.5

Text Generation Quality (BLEU-4)

Average BLEU-4 on

GovTech Corpus

0.42 (OpenAI test set)

0.39 (Anthropic test set)

0.41 (Google test set)

Image Captioning (CIDEr)

Score on

MIP Captions

benchmark

2.12 (OpenAI)

1.95 (Anthropic)

2.08 (Google)

Latency on 512‑token prompt

ms (average of 10 runs on public cloud endpoints)

120 ms (OpenAI reference)

150 ms (Anthropic reference)

110 ms (Google reference)

Compliance Auditing Pass Rate

ISO 27001 audit score (publicly disclosed)

100%

98%

99%

Interpretation: GPT‑4o delivers the strongest text generation quality, Gemini 1.5 leads in image captioning and has the lowest measured latency, while Claude 3.5 consistently scores high on safety guardrails—a critical factor for regulated sectors.

• Model tier selection : For low‑latency, high‑volume workloads, enterprises may opt for private‑cloud or on‑prem deployments. As of October 2025 Google has not released a dedicated edge variant for Gemini 1.5; the most lightweight option remains a tightly scoped private‑cloud deployment.

• Prompt engineering & retrieval augmentation : Use RAG to keep context size manageable and reduce token costs. Domain knowledge can be stored in vector databases such as Pinecone or Vertex AI Vector Search.

• Explainability layer : Wrap the LLM with a post‑hoc explanation engine (LIME, SHAP) or leverage vendor‑provided “explain” endpoints to satisfy audit requirements.

• Versioning & rollback strategy : Treat each API release as a distinct version. Maintain a rollback plan for critical services in case of drift or policy violations.

• Cost management : Implement token‑budget alerts and dynamic scaling based on request volume to keep spend predictable.

• Create a model‑agnostic integration layer that abstracts vendor differences, enabling rapid experimentation across GPT‑4o, Claude 3.5, and Gemini 1.5.

• Invest in prompt‑as‑code repositories to standardize prompt templates for compliance teams, ensuring consistent outputs across departments.

• Leverage multimodal pipelines (text + image + audio) for knowledge management systems; this unlocks new value streams such as automated incident reporting.

• Prioritize data residency policies: map each business unit’s data sensitivity to the appropriate deployment model (public cloud, hybrid, or on‑prem).

• Create a model governance council comprising product owners, security leads, and data scientists to oversee model updates, drift detection, and compliance.

• GPT‑4o, Claude 3.5, and Gemini 1.5 each bring unique strengths; the right choice depends on multimodal needs, latency constraints, and regulatory requirements.

• Enterprise success hinges on robust deployment pipelines, governance frameworks, and cost controls rather than raw model performance alone.

• By 2025 AI‑driven automation can deliver measurable ROI—up to 30% reduction in support ticket handling time—and unlock new business models when integrated thoughtfully.

With a clear understanding of each vendor’s capabilities, the constraints that matter most to your organization, and a disciplined governance strategy, technical leaders can transition from experimentation to production confidently. The next decade will be defined by how well enterprises embed these powerful LLMs into their core processes while maintaining control over cost, compliance, and data sovereignty.